Bollywood actress Sandeepa Virk has been released on bail after spending nearly four months in Tihar Jail in connection with a ₹6 crore case linked to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
In a recent interview, the actress recalled her difficult time inside the prison, stating that Tihar is a place she would not wish even upon her worst enemy. She said that when she first arrived, she could not believe her situation and questioned why she had to go through such an ordeal.
Virk described her first day in jail as deeply distressing, particularly her experience using the washroom facilities. Reflecting emotionally, she said life can change suddenly and leave a person feeling completely helpless.
Speaking about her most challenging phase, Sandeepa Virk revealed that there was a time when she prayed daily for relief from her suffering. She said the most painful moments were when her parents came to visit her in jail, as she felt guilty about the distress caused to her family. However, she credited her parents and siblings for standing firmly by her side throughout the crisis.
The actress also opened up about the living conditions inside the prison. According to her, sharing space with over 500 inmates created a tense atmosphere. She said stress affected her health to the extent that she sometimes struggled to stand without support. She further mentioned issues related to hygiene, sleeping on the floor, strict barrack timings, and basic daily meals.
On December 27, 2025, the Delhi High Court granted her bail, noting that she had already spent more than four months in custody. The court also observed that the main accused, Amit Gupta, is currently absconding, making an early conclusion of the trial unlikely.
The Enforcement Directorate alleges that Virk was involved in transactions linked to an investment scheme in which a person was promised a lead role in a film in exchange for an investment of approximately ₹6 crore. Investigators claim the funds were routed through her bank accounts and later used for property purchases or transactions connected to an alleged e-commerce platform.
The court also took into account that the transactions in question date back to 2008–2013. Based on these considerations, bail was granted under regular legal provisions. The investigation and legal proceedings in the case are ongoing.
