Amritsar (Rajesh Sandhu): The SGPC 328 Saroop case has once again drawn attention due to rising tension between the Special Investigation Team (SIT) and the SGPC. Meanwhile, Sikh Sadhbhawna Dal has raised serious concerns about delays in the investigation. As a result, questions have increased about missing accused persons and incomplete records.
In this case, allegations involve 328 sacred Saroops and administrative irregularities. Consequently, public debate around transparency has grown stronger.
FIR Registration and SIT Investigation Progress
Initially, authorities registered FIR No. 168 on 7 December 2025. After that, the SIT began a formal investigation into the matter.
Subsequently, the SIT arrested two accused individuals. In addition, nine others joined the investigation process. However, two accused reportedly died, while three remain untraceable. Therefore, Sikh Sadhbhawna Dal demanded clarity on the status of all accused. Moreover, they insisted that the SIT explain delays in the 328 Saroop SGPC case.
Record Dispute Between SIT and SGPC
During the investigation, the SIT visited SGPC offices in Chandigarh. At that time, officials requested complete case records.
According to SIT officials, SGPC did not provide the required documents. Furthermore, they stated that nearly 14 notices were issued. Still, full cooperation did not arrive from SGPC. On the other hand, SGPC rejected these claims. Instead, they argued that legal procedures must be followed before sharing sensitive documents. As a result, both sides entered a serious disagreement.
Consequently, the SGPC 328 Saroop case became more complex.
SGPC Leadership Response
Meanwhile, SGPC President Harjinder Singh Dhami responded to the allegations. He explained that SGPC will act according to internal decisions. Additionally, he said that the organization will follow outcomes of upcoming meetings. He also added that guidance from Sikh authorities will be respected.
At the same time, he clarified that cooperation decisions will come after consultation. Therefore, SGPC has not yet fully opened all records to the SIT.
Sikh Sadhbhawna Dal Raises Strong Objections
Meanwhile, Sikh Sadhbhawna Dal strongly criticized the slow progress of the investigation. They argued that delays weaken public trust. Moreover, they highlighted that the case involves religious sentiments and financial accountability. Therefore, they demanded full transparency in the 328 Saroop SGPC case.
In addition, they stated that earlier inquiries had already accepted irregularities. Hence, they insisted that strict action must follow without delay.
Demand for CBI Investigation Gains Support
As tensions increased, the group suggested a CBI investigation. They believe that an independent agency could handle the case more fairly. Furthermore, they argued that a central probe would speed up justice. Consequently, they expressed willingness to fully cooperate with any CBI inquiry.
Thus, the demand for a higher-level investigation has gained momentum.
Conclusion: Case Still Under Active Scrutiny
Overall, the 328 Saroop SGPC case remains under active investigation. While the SIT continues its probe, disputes over records continue to slow progress.
At the same time, SGPC maintains its legal stance, and the SIT insists on document access. As a result, both sides remain at odds. Finally, public pressure continues to grow for transparency and quick action. Therefore, the coming developments in this case will be crucial for its final outcome.
Key Points of the news:
- FIR 168 was registered on 7 December 2025 in the 328 Saroop case.
- SIT arrested 2 accused; 3 remain untraceable.
- SIT claims SGPC did not provide full documents.
- SGPC insists legal process must be followed first.
- CBI probe demand is increasing due to delays.
